rr6013
Well-known member
- First Name
- Rex
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2020
- Threads
- 36
- Messages
- 1,242
- Reaction score
- 208
- Location
- Coronado Bay Panama
- Website
- shorttakes.substack.com
- Vehicles
- 1997 Tahoe 2 door 4x4
- Occupation
- Retired software developer and heavy commercial design builder
- Thread starter
- #1
Rumor mill conspiracy theories and conjecture are rife online. What if…
Mercedes Benz is in play? BAIC, its Chinese parent company, acquired Mercedes Benz, German nationalism and pride-of-ownership be damned. It’s no longer unimaginable. The next hurdle becomes why would BAIC entertain letting M-B out of its stable? Here’s what BAIC would have after sale:
It could retain Daimler Truck which just recently split away as a standalone entity. Maybe it was split in anticipation for an eventual sale? IDK. But BAIC would retain Hyundai and KIA. Both are moving well in the marketplace with Hyundai going upmarket while KIA is capturing downmarket sales - worldwide. What if it were true that M-B luxury product is not a fit to the BAIC supply chain. M-B holds $150B debt which economy of scale from Hyundai cannot help it cut costs. Is Tesla looking for more debt, more luxury cars and more legacy factory manufacturing?
Tesla absorbs M-B it looks like a separate division, brand and product. M-B is electrifying, computerizing and going ADAS fleetwide. What are Tesla incentives to acqui-hire, merge or buy M-B? First, $150B debt is attractive to shelter Tesla profits. However the tie-up Tesla can carry the cost of bringing M-B aboard longterm. What are the synergies? Complementary products, technologies and an opposing ADAS philosophy. Tesla and M-B would gain economy of scale merging its supply chains going forward. Tesla and M-B could share technology development spread over both brands products. Importantly, M-B could retain its independence and philosophy while riding aboard Tesla technology train., maintaining its distinction and its differentiation. Its a reasonable possibility then to consider.
What are the probabilities? M-B is the only marque which Tesla could gain the most, from an acquisition, merger or acqui-hire. M-B is the only marque that brings a long history of knowledge, expertise and success Tesla are just beginning to encounter in the luxury space. M-B gains decades of Tesla high technology zeitgeist that it doesn’t stand a chance of catching-up to in BEV motors, electrical, battery and manufacturing.
What’s unreasonable? BAIC is creating a competitor. Not in its Hyundai or KIA automotive space. though. Daimler Trucks have a direct threat from Tesla Semi. Why would they agree to let Tesla build its Semi cheaper at its own expense? More 4680 cells used in M-B, cheaper the cells are to pack Semi’s humongous battery. Tesla would have to be willing to exit the trucking business if BAIC objects. And BAIC might benefit buying Semi, 4680’s at discount and gain battery cells for its Freightliner and Peterbuilt tractors. Or compromise.
Longterm, measured in EM years, there’s overhead where M-B and Tesla costs can be shared in R&D, Mfg, Design and Logistics. This includes China that is a market where M-B critically needs a presence. Tesla can bring M-B into China. Eventually, the two marques never combine brands into one. BUT for the closing thought on the transaction? Elon Musk has nearly tranched out his ownership tokens in Tesla. Who better than M-B culture, global reputation and success worldwide could Elon Musk leave to Tesla and Tesla talented executives to be in better partnership?
Mars is calling…is that worth the $500B Tesla would spend getting Mercedes(@5x multiplier). I don’t know another company that could swing that in the debt markets. Interesting…and does BAIC need $500B cash/equity? Horrors, Tesla would have an ace in the hole FSD is a bust. Best of all outcomes, M-B gains FSD when it goes mainstream and no one else can buy it!
Where is the limiting factor? I fail to see a downside.
Mercedes Benz is in play? BAIC, its Chinese parent company, acquired Mercedes Benz, German nationalism and pride-of-ownership be damned. It’s no longer unimaginable. The next hurdle becomes why would BAIC entertain letting M-B out of its stable? Here’s what BAIC would have after sale:
It could retain Daimler Truck which just recently split away as a standalone entity. Maybe it was split in anticipation for an eventual sale? IDK. But BAIC would retain Hyundai and KIA. Both are moving well in the marketplace with Hyundai going upmarket while KIA is capturing downmarket sales - worldwide. What if it were true that M-B luxury product is not a fit to the BAIC supply chain. M-B holds $150B debt which economy of scale from Hyundai cannot help it cut costs. Is Tesla looking for more debt, more luxury cars and more legacy factory manufacturing?
Tesla absorbs M-B it looks like a separate division, brand and product. M-B is electrifying, computerizing and going ADAS fleetwide. What are Tesla incentives to acqui-hire, merge or buy M-B? First, $150B debt is attractive to shelter Tesla profits. However the tie-up Tesla can carry the cost of bringing M-B aboard longterm. What are the synergies? Complementary products, technologies and an opposing ADAS philosophy. Tesla and M-B would gain economy of scale merging its supply chains going forward. Tesla and M-B could share technology development spread over both brands products. Importantly, M-B could retain its independence and philosophy while riding aboard Tesla technology train., maintaining its distinction and its differentiation. Its a reasonable possibility then to consider.
What are the probabilities? M-B is the only marque which Tesla could gain the most, from an acquisition, merger or acqui-hire. M-B is the only marque that brings a long history of knowledge, expertise and success Tesla are just beginning to encounter in the luxury space. M-B gains decades of Tesla high technology zeitgeist that it doesn’t stand a chance of catching-up to in BEV motors, electrical, battery and manufacturing.
What’s unreasonable? BAIC is creating a competitor. Not in its Hyundai or KIA automotive space. though. Daimler Trucks have a direct threat from Tesla Semi. Why would they agree to let Tesla build its Semi cheaper at its own expense? More 4680 cells used in M-B, cheaper the cells are to pack Semi’s humongous battery. Tesla would have to be willing to exit the trucking business if BAIC objects. And BAIC might benefit buying Semi, 4680’s at discount and gain battery cells for its Freightliner and Peterbuilt tractors. Or compromise.
Longterm, measured in EM years, there’s overhead where M-B and Tesla costs can be shared in R&D, Mfg, Design and Logistics. This includes China that is a market where M-B critically needs a presence. Tesla can bring M-B into China. Eventually, the two marques never combine brands into one. BUT for the closing thought on the transaction? Elon Musk has nearly tranched out his ownership tokens in Tesla. Who better than M-B culture, global reputation and success worldwide could Elon Musk leave to Tesla and Tesla talented executives to be in better partnership?
Mars is calling…is that worth the $500B Tesla would spend getting Mercedes(@5x multiplier). I don’t know another company that could swing that in the debt markets. Interesting…and does BAIC need $500B cash/equity? Horrors, Tesla would have an ace in the hole FSD is a bust. Best of all outcomes, M-B gains FSD when it goes mainstream and no one else can buy it!
Where is the limiting factor? I fail to see a downside.